Call/text: +1 (604) 337-7899
AI Agency success stories

AI Agency Success Stories

So you want to start an AI marketing agency?

And the first question that came to your mind was, “Well, is an AI marketing agency profitable?”

Is an AI marketing agency profitable?

Yes, an AI marketing agency is generally a profitable one. However, you still need to consider several factors since these things always impact the overall outcome.

  • The potential revenue for an AI marketing agency is $6M per year.
  • The initial investment required is $6.75K.
  • The gross margin for an AI marketing agency is 83%.

To determine whether your business is profitable, you should earn more than your expenses within 12 months. However, while you’re in your first month, it can be challenging to know what to expect.

Therefore, you should maintain a record of your monthly expenses and income to determine whether you’re meeting your goals. By doing this step, you can see how your AI marketing agency is doing and if any changes or adjustments need to be made to enhance or maintain your efforts.

Is an AI marketing agency worth it?

If you’re wondering if an AI marketing agency is worth it, the answer is a big YES. With these types of businesses, you can earn as much as $6M per year.

Further, you can have your initial investment of $6.75K back within 12 months. Simply put, it’s a business worth a shot, especially if you have the resources and make the necessary efforts to achieve or surpass the target.

With a market size of $10.4B, it will be possible for you to enjoy a monthly revenue of $415K. As such, it’s the type of business you should consider starting.

Of course, you must learn and understand every aspect of running an AI marketing agency to ensure success. Still, as long as you have the initial investment and can endure 12 months before your actual gains, this business is worth it.

You might even need to get some financing to launch such a business. We have a guide exactly for you on how to finance an AI marketing agency.

How much can you make in an AI marketing agency?

With an AI marketing agency, you can make as much as $6M per year since it has a gross margin of 83%.

All you need is an initial investment of $6.75K. Then, with proper knowledge and sustained effort, you can have the ROI (or return on investment) within 12 months.

Generally, an AI marketing agency can offer you a monthly profit of $415K since you’re catering to a market size of $10.4B. But, of course, this size varies depending on your area of choice.

How much does an AI marketing agency make a week?

The weekly profit for an AI marketing agency ranges around $104K. As such, you can enjoy a monthly profit of $415K.

To know if your AI marketing agency achieves the weekly profit target, you need to keep track of the total earnings you get per day. Afterward, you’ll want to consider subtracting the expenses you have daily.

Learning your weekly profit can also show whether you’re hitting your target goal for your AI marketing agency.

How much does an AI marketing agency owner make?

The income of an AI marketing agency owner can vary depending on various factors such as location, size, competition, and the owner’s business skills.

But to give you some idea, the weekly salary of the owner of an established AI marketing agency is about $104K. But it can also be 80% lower or higher depending on so many factors it’s almost impossible to say exactly.

While the potential for earning a good income as an AI marketing agency owner exists, success in this field requires a commitment to providing quality products and services and building a strong reputation within the community.

AI marketing agency profit margins

Generally speaking, an AI marketing agency makes a profit margin of around 83%. Profit margins refer to the percentage of revenue that remains after deducting all expenses associated with running a business. In the case of an AI marketing agency, profit margins can vary depending on various factors, such as the type and quality of products sold, the size of the store, and the level of competition in the area.

However, these figures can vary depending on the pricing strategy, inventory management, and overall efficiency of the business. To maintain healthy profit margins, AI marketing agency owners must focus on managing costs, negotiating favorable supplier terms, and providing high-quality products and services to attract and retain customers. By doing so, AI marketing agency owners can ensure long-term sustainability and profitability for their business.

AI marketing agency owner salary

The salary of an AI marketing agency owner is an unpredictable figure. It’s significantly influenced by numerous factors, including the store’s location, its size, and the degree of competition. An owner of a well-established AI marketing agency, in a prime position, might see an average weekly salary around the ballpark of $104K.

But it’s worth noting, such numbers aren’t always consistent. The earnings can vary wildly, potentially swinging by as much as 80% either way.

Achieving consistent success and maintaining a reliable income stream in this industry requires a deep commitment. It’s imperative to offer high-quality products, deliver impeccable customer service, and nurture a trusted bond with the community you serve.

Conclusion

In a nutshell, an AI marketing agency is quite promising if you plan on starting one. With a market size of $10.4B, you can enjoy a potential revenue of around $6M per year with a gross margin of 83%.

Considering this information, you can enjoy a return on investment within 12 months, especially if you have a monthly profit of $415K. Overall, the success of your AI marketing agency also depends on your effort and knowledge about it. If you persevere with these things, you can ensure that your AI marketing agency is profitable.

Make sure you have a proper AI marketing agency plan and know how to get clients for your AI marketing agency.

AI Agency Solutions

New WebRTC WG Charter

w3c

The new charter for the WebRTC Working Group has been approved. Current members will need to re-join, from the WebRTC WG mail list…

Hi all,

Great news, the new W3C WebRTC Working Group charter [1] has been officially approved by the W3C Director [2].

The revised charter adds a deliverable for the next version of WebRTC, has an updated list of deliverables based on the work started under the previous charter, clarifies its decision policy, and extends the group
until March 2018.

The charter of this Working Group includes a new deliverable that require W3C Patent Policy licensing commitments from all Participants.

Consequently, all Participants must join or re-join the group, which involves agreeing to participate under the terms of the revised charter and the W3C Patent Policy. Current Participants may continue to attend meetings (teleconferences and face-to-face meetings) for 45 days after this announcement, even if they have not yet re-joined the group. After 45 days (ie. September 10, 2015), ongoing participation (including meeting attendance and voting) is only permitted for those who have re-joined the group.

Use this form to (re)join:
https://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/47318/join

Instructions to join the group are available at:
http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/47318/instructions

Thanks,
Vivien on behalf of the WebRTC WG Chairs and Staff contacts

[1] http://www.w3.org/2015/07/webrtc-charter.html
[2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2015JulSep/0024.html

AI Agency Solutions

Changes in the W3C WebRTC Working Group

w3c

With the forthcoming re-charter @W3C WebRTC Working Group, there were also a few managerial changes:

  • Peter Saint Andre (@andyet fame), will be joining as co-editor
  • Erik Lagerway, yours truly (co-founder @hookflash), will be joining as co-chair
  • Vivien Lacourba, W3C staff, will be helping out Dominique Hazael-Massieux with increased W3C staff time in the WebRTC Working Group

I am personally flattered and over the moon excited to have been asked to co-chair the WebRTC Working Group and look forward to working with Harald and Stefan to help usher in the next era of WebRTC standards work.

/Erik

Ai Assistants

Do you really want a dual MTI video codec for WebRTC?

H.264 AVC for WebRTC VP8 - Webm

Update: There is now some healthy conversation in the IETF WG around what “compliant” and “compatible” actually mean. More on this as it unfolds.

We are now in the final throes of a consensus call in the IETF around which video codec should be made mandatory for those building WebRTC apps, services et al, who wish to be considered “WebRTC Compliant”. The codec contenders are VP8 and H.264, in many forms and combinations.

This latest consensus call is for both codecs to be mandated for all WebRTC endpoints, or “dual MTI codec”. I am sure I will catch hell from someone on language but that is the essence of it. As one might expect, there are some that are in favor and some that are against a dual MTI video codec. Those in favor seem motivated to accept this based on the promise of interoperability that might follow and other reasons. As one might expect, we are all quite eager to put this debate to bed so we could get on with other work.

This is not a decision that should be made lightly. Let’s consider the implications. Imposing a dual MTI suggests that every developer that wishes to produce a WebRTC compliant app must implement both codecs.

Coming from a co-founder of an RTC toolkit vendor I can tell you that this does not sit very well with me, nor others in the WebRTC WG. One glance at the thread comments should provide some insight.

I find it difficult to agree to mandate a dual MTI codec knowing that there are a great many developers who will not want or will be in a position to implement both codecs. Yes, many WebRTC SDK vendors will support both. Even if both codecs and their transports are provided as part or could be easily added to the application at compile time it doesn’t mean that every developer will want to implement or ship both codecs.

Bottom line is, according this consensus, if developers do not implement/ship both codecs they are not considered WebRTC compliant. To me, this seems like a rather unreasonable expectation. Developers should be able to choose which codec they ship, and not be forced to do 2x the work to become compliant.

I would love to hear from other developers on this. Do you plan on implementing both VP8 and H.264 in your apps?

1 2 3 8 9
Archives
Recent Comments
    Privacy Settings
    We use cookies to enhance your experience while using our website. If you are using our Services via a browser you can restrict, block or remove cookies through your web browser settings. We also use content and scripts from third parties that may use tracking technologies. You can selectively provide your consent below to allow such third party embeds. For complete information about the cookies we use, data we collect and how we process them, please check our Privacy Policy
    Youtube
    Consent to display content from - Youtube
    Vimeo
    Consent to display content from - Vimeo
    Google Maps
    Consent to display content from - Google
    Spotify
    Consent to display content from - Spotify
    Sound Cloud
    Consent to display content from - Sound